This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.
I just saw this post that was a screenshot of this tweet about this woman named Leah Monk. I cannot wrap my head around how this white girl thought it was appropriate to change her look this much too look black. The transformation is just offensive.
The fact that there are BLACK people coming to her defense is too much for me. I know that not everyone is well versed in racial issues, historical implications, and how stuff like this is harmful to black people now, but damn. It’s so frustrating seeing a white person being able to use features that Black people are constantly criticized for to look trendy and cute. Not only that, but she had thousands of followers on Instagram (something like 25k) for basically being in blackface. She has since deleted her account, which I’m assuming is because of the backlash she’s currently getting.
This is too all white girls + non-black girls in general, please stop using “Black features” for aesthetics. It’s not cute and it’s annoying. Black women have historically been scrutinized and oppressed for these features you think are now trendy. Also, even though they’re currently trendy, Black women are STILL laughed at for these features, while they are often celebrated when featured on women who are not Black. Stop this nonsense, it’s 2016. This strange phenomenon of others capitalizing and appropriating Blackness needs to stop. As they say, “people love Black culture but not Black people.”
Omg its like Rachel Dolezal Jr.! If this isn’t one of the truest things I have ever read.
This was her:
This is her now:
Remember the Swedish Tanning Salon scandal too?
THIS IS TANNING ON WHITE SKIN:
THIS IS NOT:
They sold dark skin in a can and called it ‘’Tanning”. No, that’s called Blackface. No you don’t have to be making fun of Black people for it to be Blackface either. Dark skinned people are ridiculed and you want to paint yourself darker and call it “tanning” or “appreciation”. You want to show appreciation? UPLIFT AND SUPPORT REAL LIFE, ACTUALLY DARK SKINNED PEOPLE.
THIS is why we call out people like Kylie Jenner, The Kardashians and Leah Monk. Because you end up with people like Rachel Dolezal. You can’t be Black for fun while actual Black people are getting slandered, shot, killed and beaten for it. For years we’ve had to conform to a White standard of beauty to even be slightly accepted. We’re still fighting for the right to be Black and proud but suddenly now our natural features are cool and fun but ONLY on White and NON Black people? Gtfoh!
the government committed a fucking genocide against gay men (and trans women too) less than a few decades ago
there are gay men alive who remember burying their brothers and sisters while the government laughed at them because AIDS was the “gay cancer” here to finally eradicate the filthy gay men of the world
and it’s not like the AIDS crisis is over and it’s not like AIDS is still disproportionately affecting gay & bisexual men
but nah, that’s apparently not relevant in ~modern~ LGBT politics
im tired of this faux radical ahistorical horseshit
Locality: Malbunka Copper Mine, Areyonga, Northern Territory, Australia
Divorce in pre-Christian Scandinavia was relatively easy to accomplish and nowhere near as uncommon as it would have been in christianized lands. The idea of divorce being taboo was a Christian concept.
Viking divorces were also fairly egalitarian for the times. Women had a number of ways to legally ask for a divorce, just as men did, and if there were any children in the marriage both parents were responsible for providing for said children, regardless of their marital status.